Electronic Product Information (ePI) holds critical medicinal product information available to patients and healthcare providers almost in real time. Discover current state and factors needed for EU implementation and the overview of the EMA/HMA ePI Pilot Project.
Electronic Product Information (ePI) represents a standardized approach expanding public access to precise, real-time information regarding summary of product characteristics, labeling, and package leaflets. Notably, ePI incorporates technical features that facilitates the use of common data standards and structured content exchanged using FHIR technology, which enables seamless interoperability across the healthcare ecosystem. The EU member states adopted a common ePI standard and other countries globally have followed the same pathway. While a great first step, an opportunity to fundamentally transform how industry communicates product information to patients and healthcare providers remains.
ePI brings significant benefits as it allows patients with timely and accurate insights into their prescribed therapies. Patients gain access to the most current prescribing guidelines such as dosage, adverse reactions, and safety updates. Healthcare professionals (physicians and pharmacists) benefit by using structured content in ePI to support clinical decisions on treatments. ePI could also be integrated with electronic health records and e-prescribing systems, creating a seamless workflow for healthcare professionals, delivering a level of personalized medicine by highlighting the most effective therapy for patients with a specific diagnosis or clinical profile.
Recognizing the need for industry-wide coordination to make this paradigm shift a reality, this session will bring together a panel of leading voices in the ePI space. The session will deep dive into a range of topics and recommendations including the role of international data standards and exchange mechanisms for interoperability; impact of requirements on authoring structured content; strategies to overcome multilingual barriers in regulatory review; benefits of ePI in the mitigation of shortages; modernize legacy/emerging systems to allow for ePI processes; safeguarding personal identifiable information in patient-centric third-party applications.
Session Leaders:
Carlos Langezaal FTOPRA
Senior Director Regulatory Affairs,
Premier Consulting, United States of America |
|
Carlos Langezaal is Senior Director of Regulatory Affairs for Premier Consulting, a firm that provides strategic solutions and service to emerging biopharmaceutical companies from concept to commercialisation. With 30 years’ experience in regulatory affairs, Carlos has amassed a wealth of experience across all stages of global pharmaceutical development, from pre-investigational new drug application (IND) through to phase III registrational stages. He has been a member of TOPRA’s Symposium Working Party for many years, to which he has applied his knowledge and experience in regulatory strategy. |
|
|
|
Katja Pečjak Reven MTOPRA
EU/UK QPPV,
Billev Pharma East Ltd., Slovenia |
|
Katja has a Master’s in Pharmacy and has been working in the pharmaceutical industry for 20 years. Her journey in Billev Pharma East Ltd. started in September 2008 as a Director of Regulatory Affairs and EU Qualified Person Responsible for Pharmacovigilance (QPPV).
Her expertise has been sought when she was called upon to assume the role of Subject Matter Expert in the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) electronic patient information (ePI) pilot project
EMA ePI Pilot Project, representing the Pharmaceutical Industry perspective since July 2022. She is a member of Medicines for Europe working groups (RSAC, Telematics), TOPRA and an ePI Topic Group Lead in IRISS Forum. |
Speakers will include:
Elizabeth Scanlan
Scientific Communication Officer & ePI Product Owner,
EMA, the Netherlands |
|
Elizabeth Scanlan is Product Owner for electronic product information (ePI) at the European Medicines Agency. Prior to joining EMA in 2016, she worked in communication roles in the biotechnology industry and not-for-profit sector. She holds a PhD in molecular biology from Trinity College Dublin.
|
|
|
|
Jasper-Hugo Brouwers
Head of Corporate & Stakeholder Affairs,
MEB, the Netherlands |
|
Jasper-Hugo Brouwers has a background in media management and in people management. He graduated with a BBA in Media & Entertainment Management from the Christian University of the Netherlands in 2006 and has since achieved a Bachelor of Commerce from Stenden University. Between 2008 and 2014 he worked as a media and PR consultant with various firms including UMC Utrecht, before joining the Medicines Evaluation Board as acting Head of Communications. Over the past ten years, Jasper has been promoted five times, ultimately to his current position as Head of Corporate & Stakeholder Affairs.
|
Catering
Please visit one of the catering stands as indicated on the floorplan to enjoy a cup of coffee or tea during the networking break. Various snacks will also be served during the break. Tables and seating can be found throughout the exhibition floor.
Exhibitors
Don't forget to visit our wonderful exhibitors located throughout the exhibition floor during the break.
Networking
Catch up with old colleagues and make new connections during the break.
Poster Display
On the exhibition floor, TOPRA are delighted to present a collection of scientific posters submitted by our members – be sure to check them out during the session breaks!
TOPRA Membership Lounge
If you are interested in learning about the opportunities TOPRA offers or just fancy a chat, please be sure to come visit the TOPRA membership lounge located near the entrance to the exhibition.
There are sofas and coffee tables to network at, and the TOPRA stand personnel will be more than happy to answer any queries you may have. There are also plenty of flyers and brochures to pick-up!
This is also where delegates can come and collect their souvenir TOPRA teddy bear and members can collect their TOPRA water bottle.
The understanding and practice of global health is shifting significantly. For too long global health has been understood to be a one-way street from the developed to the developing countries in terms of money, priorities and solutions. While early definitions had stressed the impact of global interdependence on the determinants of health and the transfer of health risks from the Global North to the Global South, it was COVID19 that has acted as an amplifier in demonstrating the lack of global solidarity in addressing a global health crisis as well as illustrating the shortcomings of established approaches. One challenge lies in the very reduced appetite of countries to agree to global rules.
At present two test cases are driving the agenda: the negotiations of a pandemic accord at the World Health organization and the response to the mpox Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). Equity has been moved forcefully into the center of the global health arena in a very practical and political way – an obvious example is the demand to establish a system of access and benefit sharing by the negotiators from the Global South.
Global health equity is now about:
• Global supply chains, access and participation in the global health industry, production sites, data sovereignty, establishment of research centers, supporting locally driven innovations, developing digital and AI solutions;
• Establishing sovereign health systems, policies and programs, an agenda closely linked to economic development agendas – such as the Bridgetown Initiative;
• Addressing the challenges of climate change and the many ways they are linked to health;
• Highlighting the health toll of the commercial determinants of health, as reflected in high levels of non-communicable diseases.
Regional agendas, organizations and coordinated efforts from the Global South, such as the African Global Health Initiative are beginning to take on a leadership role, the G20 presidencies have also played a strong role in shifting the agenda. The deeply political nature of global health becomes ever clearer as political and economic power shifts.
Speaker:
Professor Ilona Kickbusch
Founder and Chair of the Global Health Centre, Graduate Institute
of International and Development Studies, Switzerland |
|
Professor Kiekbusch key interests relate to the political determinants of health, health in all policies and global health. She is the founder of the Global Health Centre at the Graduate Institute, Geneva. She advises countries and organizations on their global health strategies and trains health specialists and diplomats in global health diplomacy. She continues to advise the WHO.
She is a member of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. She acts as Council Chair to the World Health Summit in Berlin and is vice-president of the European Health Forum Gastein. She has been involved in German G7 and G20 activities relating to global health and the global health initiatives of the German EU presidency in 2020. She chaired the international advisory board for the development of the German global health strategy. She publishes widely and serves on various commissions and boards. She initiated the @wgh300 list of women leaders in global health. She is program chair of the leaders in health network SCIANA. She is co-chair of a Lancet FT Commission on "Governing health futures 2030: growing up in a digital world." She continues to advise the World Health Organization.
Professor Kiekbusch has had a distinguished career with the World Health Organization. She was key instigator of the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion and WHOs Healthy Cities Network and has remained a leader in this field. She was the director of the Global Health Division at Yale University School of Public Health and responsible for the first major Fulbright Programme on global health. She has published widely and received many prizes and recognitions.
She has been awarded the Cross of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany (Bundesverdienstkreuz) in recognition of her "invaluable contributions to innovation in governance for global health and global health diplomacy". |